Is European M&a Regulation Protectionist?*
نویسندگان
چکیده
Why do regulatory authorities scrutinise mergers and acquisitions? The authorities themselves claim to be combating monopoly power and protecting consumers. But the last two decades of empirical research has found little supporting evidence for such motives. An alternative is that M&A regulation is actually designed to protect privileged firms. We provide a test of protectionism by studying whether European regulatory intervention is more likely when European firms are harmed by increased competition. Our findings raise a suspicion of protectionist motivations by the European regulator during the 1990s. The results are robust to many statistical difficulties, including endogeneity between investor valuations and regulatory actions.
منابع مشابه
Protectionist High-flyers: Special Interest Politics in the Airline Industry of the European Union
متن کامل
The Sources of Protectionist Drift in Representative Democracies
We analyze a two country-two good model of international trade in which citizens in each country differ by their specific factor endowments. The trade policy in each country is set by the politician who has been elected by the citizens in a previous stage. Due to a delegation effect citizens generally favor candidates who are more protectionist than they are. The one candidate per country-equil...
متن کاملOn Butterflies and Frankenstein: A Dynamic Theory of Regulation
There are major differences in regulation among various countries. A particular case is the difference between the EU and US in regulating biotechnology. We develop a formal and dynamic model of government decision-making on regulation. We show that minor differences in consumer preferences can lead to important and persistent regulatory differences, and that temporary shocks to preferences can...
متن کاملThe EU Factor in Trade Policies of Central European Countries */
The paper examines the development of foreign trade institutions and policies in Central European countries that were invited to negotiate accession to the EU. The dismantling of state trading has dramatically liberalized conditions in market access. Yet, with the exception of Estonia and to a lesser extent the Czech Republic, they have followed the policy of bilateral rather than multilateral ...
متن کاملThe Legality of State Protectionist Laws Against Legal Process Outsourcing
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 326 I. HISTORY AND BACKGROUND OF LPO ....................................... 327 A. Evolution of Outsourcing .................................................... 327 B. Growth of LPO Industry ..................................................... 329 C. Risks and Benefits of LPOs .....................
متن کامل